social movement

Apr 15, 2005

Cease and Desist: Repression, Strategic Voting and U.S. Presidential Elections

In this talk Dr. Jennifer Earl uses data on strategic voting, which occurred during the 2000 and 2004 U.S. presidential elections, to examine two core concerns of social movements scholars: (1) the effects of repression on subsequent movement mobilization; and (2) the effects of repression on subsequent tactical choices.

Tags: 2005, Presidential campaign, repression, social movement, strategic voting

Where Have all the Protests Gone? Online

Earl, Jennifer. 2007. “Where Have all the Protests Gone? Online.” Washington Post, Outlook Section, page 1. Sunday, February 4, 2007.

The New Site of Activism

Earl, Jennifer and Alan Schussman. 2003. “The New Site of Activism: On-line Organizations, Movement Entrepreneurs, and the Changing Location of Social Movement Decision-Making.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 24: 155-187.

Cease and Desist: Repression, Strategic Voting and the 2000 Presidential Election

Earl, Jennifer and Alan Schussman. 2004. “Cease and Desist: Repression, Strategic Voting and the 2000 Presidential Election.” Mobilization 9(2): 188-202.

From Barricades to Firewalls? Strategic Voting and Social Movement Leadership in the Internet Age

Schussman, Alan and Jennifer Earl. 2004. “From Barricades to Firewalls? Strategic Voting and Social Movement Leadership in the Internet Age.” Sociological Inquiry 74(4): 439-463.

Pursuing Social Change Online: The Use of Four Protest Tactics on the Internet

Earl, Jennifer. 2006. “Pursuing Social Change Online: The Use of Four Protest Tactics on the Internet.” Social Science Computer Review 24(3): 362-377.

Leading Tasks in a Leaderless Movement: The Case of Strategic Voting

Earl, Jennifer. 2007. “Leading Tasks in a Leaderless Movement: The Case of Strategic Voting” Special Issue on Social Movement Leadership in the American Behavioral Scientist 50(10): 1327-1349.